<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lucene.NET</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.devatwork.nl/articles/lucenenet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.devatwork.nl</link>
	<description>A day in the life of a developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:19:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anatoliy</title>
		<link>http://www.devatwork.nl/articles/lucenenet/comment-page-1/#comment-6759</link>
		<dc:creator>Anatoliy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devatwork.nl/?page_id=281#comment-6759</guid>
		<description>Solr  is extension for lucene, it is stand alone service which listening specific port for search queries. It is simple to use, but for simple content project with not so lot visitors (when project locates on one server) is better to use lucene.net look:
  why you need to send request by HTTP then system will execute same things with fyle system to find results. you can directly check filesystem index for results. 
  Solr is good for big projects when [lucene index] colud locates on other server. if not - simple lucene is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solr  is extension for lucene, it is stand alone service which listening specific port for search queries. It is simple to use, but for simple content project with not so lot visitors (when project locates on one server) is better to use lucene.net look:<br />
  why you need to send request by HTTP then system will execute same things with fyle system to find results. you can directly check filesystem index for results.<br />
  Solr is good for big projects when [lucene index] colud locates on other server. if not &#8211; simple lucene is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandeep shimpi</title>
		<link>http://www.devatwork.nl/articles/lucenenet/comment-page-1/#comment-5970</link>
		<dc:creator>sandeep shimpi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devatwork.nl/?page_id=281#comment-5970</guid>
		<description>Hi.. i want to create indexing on MSWord files.Can you have any idea or code to create indexing for this word files.i don&#039;t want to use XML doc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.. i want to create indexing on MSWord files.Can you have any idea or code to create indexing for this word files.i don&#8217;t want to use XML doc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.devatwork.nl/articles/lucenenet/comment-page-1/#comment-3966</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devatwork.nl/?page_id=281#comment-3966</guid>
		<description>Hi, nice article!
But how does this relate to Solr (http://solrsharp.codeplex.com/) with regard to facet search?
I mean, are you implementing something that Solr also has?
Should I use Lucene.net combined with solr, or will your standalone solution suffice?

It would be nice if you could provide the pros and cons of these 2 methods! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, nice article!<br />
But how does this relate to Solr (<a href="http://solrsharp.codeplex.com/" rel="nofollow">http://solrsharp.codeplex.com/</a>) with regard to facet search?<br />
I mean, are you implementing something that Solr also has?<br />
Should I use Lucene.net combined with solr, or will your standalone solution suffice?</p>
<p>It would be nice if you could provide the pros and cons of these 2 methods! <img src='http://www.devatwork.nl/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

